Could species count (richness) statistics be added to the seasonal charts on the taxa information page? Similar to the species record quantity change curve, only the metric has changed to the monthly statistical count of species observed.
This would more clearly illustrate the richness trends of species in a given area and offer a better reference for nature observation trips. For example, if I plan to visit Xishuangbanna for butterfly watching, I would like to know which month boasts the highest butterfly species diversity there.
The same approach can be extended to other taxonomic groups, such as trends in insect species richness , trends in amphibian and reptile species richness, and so on.
I donât think abundance statistics can be added based on iNaturalist observations. iNaturalist can show how many observer/organism interactions were posted at a given time, but not how many of the organisms were actually present.
i donât think it makes sense to add this sort of functionality to the taxon page, since i would think that most of the time people are looking at the taxon page, theyâre looking at species or subspecies level.
moreover, for more complicated views of data like this, itâs better to have have a separate page to present this sort of data, rather than trying to cram all that functionality into the taxon page.
The main reason is that this interface allows for the selection of biological groups and locations, and it is also made into a line graph, which is quite appropriate to be placed in this interface.
iNat is basically a very loose presence/absence indicator and not much more.
A flock of 20 Swinhoeâs White Eyes (a small bird common in East and SE Asia) may get a single observation, while a single fruiting mushroom during a bio-blitz may get 50 observations.
Thanks for clarifying! âAbundanceâ in ecology usually refers to âhow many of a speciesâ vs. âhow many speciesâ so I updated the topic title to reduce confusion.
Presence/absence of species across time is what the request is hoping to display.
Then it should probably be âspecies richnessâ not âabundanceâ, or possibly âphenologyâ. Itâs unclear whatâs actually being asked and the edited title doesnât make it more clear.
Abundance is specifically about the number of individuals, richness is about the number of species, and phenology is about the timing of events such as flowering or presence/absence.
Your edit is correct. I havenât found the option to edit this post yet.
Could you please replace âspecies abundanceâ in the main text with either âspecies countâ or âspecies richnessâ? Thank you! This is to avoid any misunderstanding.