Ah, yes, I usually filter by state or county, so requiring learning information like that from the map is generally extraneous. I would think adding the Standard Place levels 1 and maybe 2 next to the level 0 (United States in this case) would fulfill that need.
@charlie good luck with your new teeth
hahaha well they aren’t mine, wish they were, would be easier that way… haha
my cat is teething now. he may not be as loud as a human baby but he does spend a lot of time chewing on my hands. and face (ow)
yikes, I didn’t even realize cats teethed. Given how sharp their teeth are that sounds painful for them.
Related issue:
https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/map-preview-breaks-for-some-observations-with-very-low-location-accuracy/73872
If I’m not mistaken shouldn’t this thread be marked as implemented?
Location accuracy not recorded is still poorly displayed. I have to open the Identify popup to a new tab - to see ‘Location Accuracy Not Recorded’. As it is, I get a deceptive map, well zoomed in because that is how I find it most useful generally.
This was seen between the houses. But the picture is clearly on the seashore. Ah - location accuracy not recorded. Copypasta comment. Cannot use DQA for Location Inaccurate. Identify popup does not SAY - Location accuracy not recorded - there is simply no info.
I have a whole string of those obs https://www.inaturalist.org/comments?utf8=✓&mine=true&q=not+recorded&commit=Search
If there’s no location accuracy, the “Acc” line just doesn’t show up on Identify. So if you don’t see a listing for it, it’s not there. Shouldn’t be necessary to open up the observation in a new tab.
But I suspect new or hurried identifiers don’t always realise - what you see on the map - is not based in fact.
No, it looks like the same issue persists:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/identify?acc_above=1000000
on Identify:
on obs detail:
you have lock zoom level ticked in that first picture, that might be why
just tried your link, it does seem to be an issue the larger the accuracy is
