# Change Mapping of Obscured Observations to Improve Data Visibility and Reduce Confusion

**URL:** <https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/change-mapping-of-obscured-observations-to-improve-data-visibility-and-reduce-confusion/28186>\
**Category:** Feature Requests\
**Tags:** under-review\
**Created:** [November 30, 2021, 1:59pm UTC](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/change-mapping-of-obscured-observations-to-improve-data-visibility-and-reduce-confusion/28186 "2021-11-30T13:59:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pisum](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/91b2a8/32.png) [@pisum](https://forum.inaturalist.org/u/pisum)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2021, 11:32pm UTC](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/change-mapping-of-obscured-observations-to-improve-data-visibility-and-reduce-confusion/28186/13 "2021-11-30T23:32:52Z")

</div>

> [@charlie](#):
>
> You feel that randomly placed points that appear to be more precise than they are is preferable

yes. in your first 2 proposals, you’re asking for some extra layer(s) of complexity whose benefits i just can’t see outweighing the costs. just educating folks that, at some level, obscured observations exist and that they may show up in nonintuitive ways on the map is a much simpler and effective solution, though no solution is going to be perfect.

of your proposals, i think the least objectionable is the last one:

> [@charlie](#):
>
> change the maps so the pins and circles display further out.

… but i think a better version of this request would be to allow the user to select which map style – grid, pins, heatmap – they prefer to see, regardless of zoom level.

> [@cthawley](#):
>
> I’d also be interested to hear what you think the cons of this change would be - some people might be able to suggest other improvements or alterations to the proposal that would satisfy all users.

the cons vary depending on the exactly how you implement any particular change. i could write many, many paragraphs to explain exactly what all the problems are for each approach, but there are too many potential implementations, and for simplicity, i’m just going to say that it mostly boils down to unnecessary complexity. you’re effectively asking for the grid version of the map to gain extra options that other versions of the map – like the pins – don’t. you’re asking potentially for a new type of map visualization to be created, too, and to be mixed together with the grid version of the map. so that’s extra processing power and maintenance, too.

someone asked for something similar to charlie’s first proposal a while back: [https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/option-to-display-obscuration-rectangles-grid-on-explore-map/7646](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/option-to-display-obscuration-rectangles-grid-on-explore-map/7646). the reasoning for the change in that thread was a little different than the reasoning in this thread, and in that thread, i describe mostly why it’s a bad approach from the perspective of privacy, since that was the main con in in the context of that thread, while unnecessary complexity is the main con in the context of this thread (and in general).

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/change-mapping-of-obscured-observations-to-improve-data-visibility-and-reduce-confusion/28186)._