# Computer Vision on photos with multiple organisms

**URL:** <https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/computer-vision-on-photos-with-multiple-organisms/9088>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [January 3, 2020, 2:37am UTC](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/computer-vision-on-photos-with-multiple-organisms/9088 "2020-01-03T02:37:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jsulzmann](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.inaturalist.org/jsulzmann/32/1801_2.png) [@jsulzmann](https://forum.inaturalist.org/u/jsulzmann)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2020, 2:37am UTC](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/computer-vision-on-photos-with-multiple-organisms/9088/1 "2020-01-03T02:37:15Z")

</div>

Apologies if this has been discussed previously but I couldn’t find it in the other CV threads. Sometimes, observers will upload a single photo multiple times to create observations for each species shown in the photo (e.g., a mixed flock of shorebirds).

I’m curious about how this affects the computer vision’s “learning,” because I find myself second-guessing whether it’s a good idea to confirm some of these observations to bring them up to Research Grade. If a photo shows Species A prominently in dead center, and Species B is tucked off in a corner and maybe a bit out of focus, is elevating the photo to RG for Species B going to “confuse” the CV system? Same thing for photos where there’s 20 individuals of Species A and one individual of Species B mixed in.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![odandno](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.inaturalist.org/odandno/32/2068_2.png) [@odandno](https://forum.inaturalist.org/u/odandno)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2020, 3:47am UTC](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/computer-vision-on-photos-with-multiple-organisms/9088/2 "2020-01-03T03:47:33Z")

</div>

Worrying about computer vision training seems utterly foolish (unless you’re one of the developers). If it can’t handle multiple species in one photo it’s useless. In fact, those photos are probably more useful.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jbecky](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.inaturalist.org/jbecky/32/3019_2.png) [@jbecky](https://forum.inaturalist.org/u/jbecky)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2020, 3:59am UTC](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/computer-vision-on-photos-with-multiple-organisms/9088/3 "2020-01-03T03:59:21Z")

</div>

I post photos from scuba diving and there are almost always multiple species in a photo. I try to include a crop or two of just the species I want to ID with a group shot to show scale and habitat. Computer Vision will just have to learn.

On the other hand, I duplicate the observation so the same photograph is used for both observations, rather than uploading the same photo twice. I’m not it makes a difference to Computer Vision training, but I feel better about database space _and_ I like being able to find all the identifications from the one photo.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![charlie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/d6d6ee/32.png) [@charlie](https://forum.inaturalist.org/u/charlie)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2020, 4:08am UTC](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/computer-vision-on-photos-with-multiple-organisms/9088/4 "2020-01-03T04:08:37Z")

</div>

If i recall correctly the algorithm actually ‘looks’ at different parts of the photo and recognizes there is more than one organism… so definitely not a problem.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cmcheatle](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.inaturalist.org/cmcheatle/32/37_2.png) [@cmcheatle](https://forum.inaturalist.org/u/cmcheatle)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2020, 5:22am UTC](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/computer-vision-on-photos-with-multiple-organisms/9088/5 "2020-01-03T05:22:02Z")

</div>

As long as the species selected is present in the photo, there is no reason not to confirm it to research grade. Users are not required to provide perfect photos, or cropped photos or anything else. They are required to provide evidence. Whether that evidence is front and centre in the photo, or tucked away in the corner, or one bird within a flock of many birds etc is immaterial to its eligibility for research grade status.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jsulzmann](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.inaturalist.org/jsulzmann/32/1801_2.png) [@jsulzmann](https://forum.inaturalist.org/u/jsulzmann)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2020, 12:45pm UTC](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/computer-vision-on-photos-with-multiple-organisms/9088/7 "2020-01-03T12:45:08Z")

</div>

Thanks! That’s what I needed to know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/uploads/inaturalist/original/2X/7/7831452cf7f0d653ff1ffd34176334b7ef1b6a17.png) [@system](https://forum.inaturalist.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [March 3, 2020, 12:55pm UTC](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/computer-vision-on-photos-with-multiple-organisms/9088/8 "2020-03-03T12:55:15Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
