Welcome to the forum!
I agree with @bouteloua that iNat isn’t a good fit for institutional collections, and staff have made clear that collections shouldn’t be uploaded wholesale to iNat or iNat used as a replacement for collections management software.
There are some previous threads that touch on this like:
https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/institutional-use-of-inaturalist/49050
https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/inat-development-for-museums-or-research-centres-improve-the-value-of-research-grade-data/7743
which also cover some of the issues with attempting to use iNat in this way as well as a couple of rarer use cases (like incidental observations from collections) where iNat usage might be appropriate.
Since institutional use of the CV isn’t the main focus of this thread, if it’s desirable to continue this conversation, we can split it into its own thread or reopen one of those (or another) older one and move it there.