Your explanation is unusual, but good. I occasionally copy such information into my own records to help me identify better.
You may find it useful to copy such explanations into a document so you can just copy and paste the next time you want to explain. I have such a document I call “iNaturalist responses.”
You’ll probably want to balance speed vs. explanation. Personally, like @gcwarber I put no explanation on what I consider straightforward identifications and brief explanations for most cases where there’s a potential problem, including where I disagree with the original explanation. Sometimes, though, only a thorough explanation will do.
Thanks for doing identifications and for trying to make them helpful.