# Let's Talk Annotations

**URL:** <https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/lets-talk-annotations/627>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [March 9, 2019, 1:43am UTC](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/lets-talk-annotations/627 "2019-03-09T01:43:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 491

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marina\_gorbunova](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.inaturalist.org/marina_gorbunova/32/31454_2.png) [@marina\_gorbunova](https://forum.inaturalist.org/u/marina_gorbunova)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2022, 8:50am UTC](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/lets-talk-annotations/627/491 "2022-09-11T08:50:39Z")

</div>

> [@New Annotation: Evidence of Presence](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/new-annotation-evidence-of-presence/23945/1):
>
> **What if none of the terms fit?**
> 
> Just like existing annotations, choose the best value or, if none of the values are a good match, don’t annotate the observation.

I’m pretty sure it was said never to use tracks for something that doesn’t fit description of the field.

> [@New Annotation: Evidence of Presence](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/new-annotation-evidence-of-presence/23945/114):
>
> There isn’t a value for burrows, nests, or other homes or constructions, so don’t add an Evidence of Presence annotation to them at this time.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/lets-talk-annotations/627)._
