I’ll paste the abstract below as well, but in short we aimed to provide prospective users of iNat data with a set of guidelines, how-tos, example code, etc, to a) help explain idiosyncratic elements of iNat that are often poorly understood/misunderstood or misinterpreted by data users who are not regular iNat users (eg obscuration), and b) help drive better practises such as correct attribution.
Abstract: iNaturalist data are increasingly used in scientific research, yet researchers often lack clear guidance on how to access, handle, and properly attribute these data. Here, we provide a practical guide for the effective use of iNaturalist data in biodiversity research. We begin with an overview of key data concepts, including taxonomy, geoprivacy, location accuracy, and data availability. We then outline methods for acquiring biodiversity observation data, data summaries, and media, and provide example code in R and Python. We discuss key analytical considerations, including observer bias, the presence-only nature of the data, and appropriate modeling approaches. Finally, we highlight best practices for ensuring reproducibility through proper attribution, versioning, and transparent reporting; and we identify emerging research frontiers. This guide aims to support the responsible and effective use of iNaturalist data to further accelerate biodiversity research.
thanks for sharing the link (open access is appreciated) and downloaded the PDF. I hope to circle back with comments. Meanwhile and until then - thank you to the coauthors for leading the way on this.
What an amazing resource! Thank you for this, and I hope it will be given permanent links on the appropriate iNat Help pages.
One thing from the paper is unclear to me regarding allowable use of data: as written, it seems to suggest that unlicensed (all rights reserved) observations are completely off-limits as data sources for scientific research unless observer permission is obtained first. Yet such observations are still publicly visible web pages that can be cited with a URL. To me this would be like saying that none of the “all rights reserved” books on public library shelves can be cited or have statements made about their content without prior permission of the copyright holder. They simply can’t be “reproduced in whole or in part,” subject to whatever “fair use” different jurisdictions may allow, and fair use generally includes facts within or about the copyrighted work.
It would be great if this could be clarified by the authors and/or iNaturalist. If extended discussion is needed, this other forum topic is available.