# On Chinese cryptogams

**URL:** <https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/on-chinese-cryptogams/11336>\
**Category:** Nature Talk\
**Created:** [April 8, 2020, 10:49pm UTC](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/on-chinese-cryptogams/11336 "2020-04-08T22:49:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![coniontises](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.inaturalist.org/coniontises/32/24854_2.png) [@coniontises](https://forum.inaturalist.org/u/coniontises)\
**Post date:** [April 9, 2020, 12:17am UTC](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/on-chinese-cryptogams/11336/5 "2020-04-09T00:17:48Z")

</div>

@biosam  
Thanks for your reply.

Yes, lichenized fungi are included. While cryptogams worldwide tend to suffer from institutional taxon biases and the resulting severe lack of research funding/attention, I suspect something anomalous is at work here (and with the spiders possibly, too).

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/on-chinese-cryptogams/11336)._