# Problems with wrong suggestions

**URL:** <https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/problems-with-wrong-suggestions/12080>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [May 5, 2020, 1:17pm UTC](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/problems-with-wrong-suggestions/12080 "2020-05-05T13:17:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 21

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![upupa-epops](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.inaturalist.org/upupa-epops/32/1972_2.png) [@upupa-epops](https://forum.inaturalist.org/u/upupa-epops)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2020, 3:13am UTC](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/problems-with-wrong-suggestions/12080/21 "2020-05-06T03:13:55Z")

</div>

> [@Ajott](#):
>
> But for example look at Araniella curcubinita, which cannot be determined in the field due to similar sister species, but look at how many research grate observations there are on iNat of this species.

Consider adding that species to this post: [https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/computer-vision-clean-up-wiki/7281](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/computer-vision-clean-up-wiki/7281)  
I do think using the orange button is warranted in situations like these because otherwise they’re impossible to fix.

> [@sbushes](#):
>
> I think these prompts are pretty unclear with the current wording.

Here is a feature request for clarifying the wording (along with a lengthy discussion about how it’s meant to be used, with some clarification [here](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/change-wording-used-by-the-system-when-downgrading-an-observation-to-an-higher-level-taxa/3862/97)): [https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/change-wording-used-by-the-system-when-downgrading-an-observation-to-an-higher-level-taxa/3862](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/change-wording-used-by-the-system-when-downgrading-an-observation-to-an-higher-level-taxa/3862)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/problems-with-wrong-suggestions/12080)._