Other than location, how else can ID these species?
breeding dress in males is noticeably different, though I don’t have enough firsthand experience with obtusus to know the harder to notice at a glance details
atratulus, no red on the face
obtusus, red goes all the way along the face
Both are morphologically variable from location to location which complicates things further. In some locations morphological keys have proven useless. In New York, where they overlap the key below might be of use.
From Smith (1985) fishes of New York:
Adult males with the lateral stripe reddish orange only during the breeding season. Breeding males with pectoral fins bright orange. Caudal peduncle relatively slender. Dark specklings on sides below the lateral band rather sparse and indistinct…Rhinichthys atratulus, Eastern Blacknose Dace
Adult males with lateral band red throughout the year. Breeding males with little orange on the pectoral fins. Lower sides with conspicuous speckling. Caudal peduncle deeper…Rhinichthys meleagris (now Rhinichthys obtusus), Western Blacknose Dace".
Most the ranges have been defined after DNA evidence as going off how their morphology isn’t effective all the time. In Ontario, useful morphological keys were not found. DNA information:
I am of the opinion that in most places where using morphology might be relevant (close to range overlaps or within them), it is wholly unhelpful.
Both of the images you attached are obtusus.
LMAO figures, I only have firsthand experience with atratulus but thought breeding dress was a good way to differentiate? but yknow, guess not lol
This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.