# Spectrogram browser extension for iNaturalist by @japh - feedback welcome!

**URL:** <https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/spectrogram-browser-extension-for-inaturalist-by-japh-feedback-welcome/67415>\
**Category:** Third-party Tools and Apps for iNaturalist\
**Tags:** web, third-party-tools\
**Created:** [July 10, 2025, 2:49am UTC](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/spectrogram-browser-extension-for-inaturalist-by-japh-feedback-welcome/67415 "2025-07-10T02:49:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 104

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lnlcflx](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.inaturalist.org/lnlcflx/32/57021_2.png) [@lnlcflx](https://forum.inaturalist.org/u/lnlcflx)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2026, 4:52pm UTC](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/spectrogram-browser-extension-for-inaturalist-by-japh-feedback-welcome/67415/104 "2026-08-02T16:52:34Z")

</div>

I’m aware of I can download the extension and look into JS myself (looks like you did not obfuscate anything 👍, which is not always the case).  
I have nothing particular I would want to look into right now, but it’s more of a principal.  
I try to exclusively use open source software.  
Not because I’m reading every line of code myself (I’m not skilled enough for that), but because an open project tends to have more people’s eyes on hidden bugs - at least once it reaches a certain level of success, which I would argue iNatSpectro has.  
A lack of a public repo with the possibility to publicly report issues is a hurdle in that regard.

But ofc it is your decision and I understand that it takes a bit of additional work, but can also have advantages.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/spectrogram-browser-extension-for-inaturalist-by-japh-feedback-welcome/67415)._