The genus Mycena is "imperiled" in British Columbia?

Nature Talk
1

I’ve always thought of the genus Mycena as a large, common, and very diverse group of agaric fungi, especially here on the Pacific coast of America and Canada. So, since when has the genus been “imperiled/vulnerable”? Is this an error? I tried searching the website that was cited:

Conservation Status: imperiled (S2S4) in British Columbia, CA (NatureServe)

and I found nothing…

How could this be? If this is really true, what does that mean for the species? A few miles to the south in Washington, there is no vulnurable status on observations of Mycena.

Bleeding Fairy Helmet (Mycena haematopus) from Mount Seymour Pky, North Vancouver, BC, CA on October 17, 2023 at 10_29 AM by loloxd · iNaturalist - Google Chrome 9_1_2024 8_57_50 PM
Bleeding Fairy Helmet (Mycena haematopus) from Mount Seymour Pky, North Vancouver, BC, CA on October 17, 2023 at 10_29 AM by loloxd · iNaturalist - Google Chrome 9_1_2024 8_57_50 PM1728×796 115 KB

Sorry for dragging loloxd into this, if you’re reading this.

2

There’s already a flag on this topic on the taxon - best to continue the discussion and tag in relevant people there: https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/576401

3 Likes
3

More generally, one should be very cautious with the conservation status tags on iNat. There is a certain logic to them, but not one that generally results in the things that are labelled as having a particular conservation status necessarily having that status. I have the impression that sometimes, for example, one difficult to distinguish subspecies in a genus being vulnerable leads to the whole genus being marked as vulnerable.