# Track and mark identifications made through "Agree?" buttons

**URL:** <https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/track-and-mark-identifications-made-through-agree-buttons/243>\
**Category:** Feature Requests\
**Created:** [February 13, 2019, 4:29pm UTC](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/track-and-mark-identifications-made-through-agree-buttons/243 "2019-02-13T16:29:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 25

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jdmore](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.inaturalist.org/jdmore/32/1116_2.png) [@jdmore](https://forum.inaturalist.org/u/jdmore)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2019, 7:00pm UTC](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/track-and-mark-identifications-made-through-agree-buttons/243/25 "2019-03-29T19:00:32Z")

</div>

> [@JeremyHussell](#):
>
> Note that the computer vision icon also comes with no information about the motivation behind its use.

Yeah, that’s why I asked. I’m always double-checking IDs regardless, because I know that Computer Vision gets used in lots of different ways, some better than others, and IDs without Computer Vision aren’t necessarily any better on average. It would be likewise with Agrees.

And I do [agree](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/agree-button-on-identify-thumbnails/1597/4) that the agree button on ID thumbnails needs to be re-thought, for sure.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/track-and-mark-identifications-made-through-agree-buttons/243)._
