I’m thrilled about this! I’m so happy someone is ready to get stuck into them.
The Cape’s fynbos seethes with daisies. We see many species of A Nother Yellow Daisy on each weekly walk.
When I don’t know a group (for example, plants), I will sometimes identify Unknown observations from new users to a very high level as a bit of a teaching aid. Unknown observations do tend to get lost, so a new user has a better chance of more detailed information if they stick in at least a higher ID. I don’t know if it actually does work as a teaching aid (I do leave a little comment - a tip), but I have seen an Unknown go from Flowering Plant to a finer ID in an hour or so.
Personally I prefer to ID from Family (Noctuidae). “Butterflies and moths” is far too broad. As a rule, butterflies confuse me, and many moth Families give me the heebie-jeebies (hello, Geometridae!). I suppose I could go through higher level observations to pick out the Noctuids, but there is lots of work available for me at the Family level already.
I suspect it depends on what people like doing. Certainly any advancement in the identity of an observation is usually worthwhile, but it’s not where I prefer to spend my time.
Edit - here is an example where my ID to Order went rapidly to species - Limber Pine (Pinus flexilis) from Division No. 15, CA-AB, CA on August 15, 2018 at 11:48 AM by Bruce Homer-Smith · iNaturalist.ca
= DYC (damn yellow composite)
It helps other people when they have active filters i.e. only show plants. If things are unknown, these will be missed as I can’t imagine as many people include unknown into their search.
For my preferred group of insects, I do separate searches for the Family, Sub Order, Order, Class and finally unknown. When I am looking through the unknown I will generally add the insects that I see to Order, or if I am in a rush to Class, as I know doing this will save time for other Entomologists and I would hope that they do the same.
As a result of this message, I will now include Sub Class as I have no doubt missed things in there :-)
I find that often I can often refine it to a point where it catches the attention of an expert in that field and sometimes its updated to species fairly quickly when I do that - so I feel it is often helpful.
I feel that narrowing down from Plant to fern, moss, flowering plant etc is helpful -not just for advancing the individual identification but for better info on how many observations are being made in these different broad groups.
I often will narrow my search to flowering plants since I don’t know much about the others. So having someone else separate mosses, ferns, conifers, flowering, etc. is very helpful.
This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.