i realize this, but it isn’t convincing me at all, and it’s coming off as condescending and overly aggressive (i am saying this as a forum user, not a moderator, you aren’t breaking any rules here to be clear). I am hearing that you prefer the system as it is, I am saying I find it very hard to use as more obscured observations appear, especially when zoomed out to a mid-level. Given it has 16 votes others seem to agree with me. (of course, there are no negative votes tracked so it could be more people disagree than agree, i have no idea). As for whether it is viable, i think speculation here isn’t too helpful other than if it is from the devs. I’ve seen this sort of thing on lots of other websites, so hardly think it makes sense to say it isn’t possible or reasonable to do.
charlie
21
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Option to display obscuration rectangles grid on Explore map | 17 | 1635 | November 8, 2019 | |
| View true locations on maps for observations with trusted hidden coordinates | 53 | 6853 | May 6, 2026 | |
| Toggle obscured observations on/off on maps | 25 | 3097 | February 4, 2026 | |
| Obscuring rectangle on obs with large accuracy circles may not encompass true location | 39 | 3624 | May 14, 2026 | |
| Allow geographically obscured observations to be masked in map displays, so that accurate maps of explored regions can be generated, | 5 | 285 | January 6, 2026 |