Change wording used by the system when downgrading an observation to an higher level taxa

i couldn’t find an existing observation that fits this exact case, but i found this observation (https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/22438288), where someone IDed this to something incorrect, and another person IDed this up to Dicot with a disagreement. i went in and IDed first a Baccharis halimifolia and then as Eupatorium capillifolium, and either way, the Observation ID stayed at Dicot. that matches what the blog says branch disagreement will do, and that’s why i wouldn’t ID as Dicot + disagree in my Pisum example.

1 Like