Thanks for the info! It seems like the most common problem I’m seeing is duplicate observations (as I mentioned). I have curator permissions, but I’m not sure how to properly handle these. First, how do I determine which observation is legit and which is the duplicate? Should I just assume the earliest one is the original? What do I do about the duplicate? Do I mark the image as a copyright violation and then mark the observation as no evidence of organism? Just wondering what the best practice is. If I notice an account that has lots of duplicates, should I go ahead and suspend it?
zygy
35
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| City Nature Challenge - issues & suggestions for improvement | 65 | 2278 | May 31, 2025 | |
| Thanks and appreciation for the tireless flaggers | 69 | 1735 | May 8, 2025 | |
| Large numbers of falsified observations for this year's City Nature Challenge | 40 | 2448 | May 8, 2025 | |
| City Nature Challenge 2026 | 205 | 5714 | June 25, 2026 | |
| How can local organizers make the CNC better? | 40 | 1004 | May 27, 2025 |