If your ID work on this species has caused the # of “Research Grade” observations to increase significantly, it will probably affect the Computer Vision. I see this frequently with spiders - as soon as there are enough RG observations for the CV to “learn” a new species, it will start suggesting that species for any number of mostly-unrelated observations. There have been a few discussions about this recently, which may shed some light on what’s going on. This one might be most relevant:
https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/inat-misidentifies-xysticus-as-bassaniana/63896
Unfortunately, using image recognition to ID spiders (outside of a handful of large/colorful/distinctive species) is asking a lot, and arachnologists on iNat probably will just have to live with the limitations of what it can do.