I am less inclined to accept that given that they do not change after the error is pointed out. Granted, every pseudoscientist thinks they know what they are doing; but the flipside is that the scientific community does not coddle them.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How to deal with persistent misidentifiers (i.e. people, not misidentifications) | 20 | 590 | December 24, 2024 | |
| Rampant wrong IDs and blind agreeing; user won't respond | 11 | 768 | April 21, 2020 | |
| (Possibly) intentionally wrong IDs | 10 | 1424 | June 24, 2025 | |
| Polite way to deal with misidentifications when the user is active but not reviewing | 19 | 1082 | February 28, 2020 | |
| Finding Observations IDed by a Particular Person | 16 | 780 | April 12, 2026 |