This doesn’t really seem to be a fair or accurate assessment of many deviations. Broadly deviations tend to be added for a good reason, not for any random frivolous reason. Are there exceptions? Of course. But I don’t think people are just en masse adding bogus names. What is important is that these deviations are formally logged. Also, external authorities can and do make mistakes or bad decisions, so just blindly following them for the sake of stability isn’t always the optimal decision
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardize Mammal and Bird Common Names? | 25 | 828 | October 25, 2025 | |
| Erroneous and Uncommon "Common Names" As The Default | 19 | 2249 | October 17, 2019 | |
| Which common name to use - the most common or taxonomically accurate? | 19 | 3037 | April 8, 2025 | |
| AOS Bird name changes, how will this affect iNaturalist? | 19 | 1221 | December 5, 2023 | |
| Inconsistent subspecies name syntax in iNat | 15 | 666 | June 16, 2024 |