Disappointing consistent failure: users not marking observations as cultivated

General
6

Forgive me; Given the replies, I seem to be the only one not understanding what Erwin’s complaint actually is.

Is it:

  1. That there are too many observations of non-wild organisms being submitted (pets, houseplants, etc)?
  2. That users don’t select non-wild appropriately on initial upload?
  3. That what is wild vs captive/cultivated is not defined well enough?
  4. That the site and app default to wild on observation creation?
  5. That the site does not punish users who upload captive/cultivated organism as wild?
  6. That the DQA is largely handled by site users rather than iNat staff?
  7. Something else?
19 Likes