Yes, I imagine this is a ubiquitous problem, especially for insects that can’t really be identified to species based on a habitus photo. The first name that gets applied to a member of the group has a huge replication advantage and tends to snowball. I’ve seen what I think are examples of this in my group, armored scale insects (Hemiptera: Diaspididae). Repairing it requires systematically changing a lot of names. But mostly I don’t try to repair them because, what if some people actually know what they are doing and have some sort of inside information about what species it is? I think a few identifiers really do have such information, but most don’t. To be very specific, I have repaired the likely cases of Chionaspis heterophyllae being identified as Chionaspis pinifoliae, but I am leaving alone the many cases of Chrysomphalus aonidium, even though I suspect several of them may be other species of Chrysomphalus.
bnormark
3
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best Course of Action with Deceptively Incorrect Common Name? | 34 | 1119 | April 26, 2024 | |
| What to do about silly common names? | 54 | 2211 | October 4, 2024 | |
| Removing existing common names that are deemed confusing | 35 | 1715 | July 3, 2023 | |
| Common names from "not good enough" sources | 73 | 5453 | December 13, 2022 | |
| Species Only Common Name Causes Misidentifications - What to do? | 37 | 2325 | February 22, 2022 |