Hmm, yeah there was an older thread about that issue but I can’t easily search it now because it’s on my phone. But lots of things. Firstly it’s true that this display method is problematic and there have been some proposals to fix it. Secondly, if someone is using inat for something as official and important as RTE surveys they should really understand how it works better. Really they should be using the tool California fish and wildlife has to track RTE. Thirdly why is it even obscured? Is there really a collection risk here ?