Cool clip! And a good example where a captured distinct motion can be very helpful to others in terms of identification.
Also, if you choose to make it standard practice to put the GIF after the stills, you can just reorder the pics for this one.
1 Like
I watched your GIF, which was very interesting, but I really appreciated being able to swap to the still image when I’d had enough.It was also good from my perspective that the still image was first, so would be the one showing in Identify.
4 Likes
Here’s a specific reason I don’t care for animated GIFs: I am a life-long birder (read: many decades) so in the field my focus is keenly attuned to catching sight of motion in my surrounding environment. That mode of attention serves me very well in the field but it can’t just be turned off when I’m sitting at my computer. From that inherent training of my vision/attention, it is nearly impossible to try to focus on one still image (e.g. on an ID or Explore page) when there’s something else wiggling in another observation in the corner of my eye. Just impossible.
6 Likes
I did not know about this project, and I just added any GIFs I made to it. It would be nice to have a filter for “Has motion” like the “Has sound” filter. This assumes it is possible to filter for the inverse of these filters with boolean logic, which I am not sure exists yet. My motion activated cameras pick up night life that we otherwise usually miss, so I was using GIFs as a workaround since videos are not allowed. It takes considerable time and effort to crop and convert those video files to GIFs, at least for me using free software. I was hoping it provides some benefit through seeing how these animals actually move. I only upload ones of reasonable interest, like a bobcat or a skunk. A camera captured a kangaroo rat like rodent once that had a very distinctive hop and gait; a still image would not convey this.
If a still image comes first and the observer does not tag it with the project, how would one find GIFs without a filter or tag specific for them? You can easily filter to observations with sound but not with motion. Personally, I would like to be able to find observations with motion more easily, but I can see how from an identifier standpoint it would be very distracting.
2 Likes
@pisum do you know any way of sorting out obs with .gif files using the api?
There doesn’t seem to be a still photo, and the motion speed is too much, so I would have to pass on identifying that one. The blue is nice, though.
There’s such a small number that a gif in addition to photos probably won’t be an issue for most identifiers. The faster ones make me dizzy, so putting them after the photo(s) would be considerate of people’s sensory issues. They do capture aspects that are hard to photograph and bring species to life in a way photos can’t.
3 Likes
as far as i know, there’s no server side filtering for this sort of thing. you could filter on the client side, but it’s easier to just implement some sort of block of GIFs on the client side.
your time is better spent loading actual videos to a platform like YouTube and then linking to those videos in your observations.
2 Likes
That one isn’t bad since there’s no movement, especially compared to the other one posted (https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/254664002) which is both headache-inducing and not a very useful observation. But I also don’t see how it being a gif is an improvement over two still photos. And while it is kind of interesting, it seems like an odd choice to post only that instead of having it third alongside the stills it was made from.
2 Likes
For some of us, unexpected GIFs can induce dizziness, nausea, headaches, even seizures. I can watch and enjoy a GIF if I know it’s coming, but otherwise, instant vertigo. So this is an accessibility issue. Just put the GIF as the second image – that’s all anyone seems to be asking.
5 Likes
You know, no one in the world is more than temporarily able-bodied. I look forward with interest to the day when you, suffering from some difficulty that other people could easily help out with or avoid exacerbating, get a reaction like the one you’re offering here. Which frankly verges on trolling.
We’re having a discussion where people do disagree and can learn. The comment supports an alternative to seeing GIF’s that isn’t entirely unreasonable, though it does come from an assumption very common for many of us; that the computer things we can do are easy for others to do. It may also come from a place of not taking the health objections to GIF’s as seriously as one might wish, but education is more effective than insult in most of these cases. (I don’t like GIF’s and that work-around seems like much too much of a nuisance, so I certainly don’t agree with it, but calling it “trolling” sounds too close to an insult to me.)
8 Likes
This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.