I appreciate all the great ideas in this thread, but City Nature Challenge is not our full-time jobs, unfortunately - which means that (1) we can’t dedicate all of our time to this, and (2) due to constraints and other obligations of our jobs, there are times of the year that we simply couldn’t organize the CNC.
I co-organize a bioblitz of the entire California coastline in early- to mid-June. We both have partnerships with our local parks departments and other organizations to run bioblitzes with them throughout the year. The two of us are co-PIs on an NSF grant studying youth learning in citizen science. I’m a marine biologist that works on my own research. We both work for non-profits and write grants to support our work. We’re yet to find an organization who wants to fund or give us a grant for the CNC, mainly because so many grants (1) do not want to support staff time, and what we really really (really really) need is a full-time person to run the CNC, and (2) are not supporting world-wide work, they are very often region or country-specific. We will keep trying of course. Writing grants is a lot of work.
It also takes a ton of work just to get all the organizers up to speed and the cities ready to go for one weekend, including teaching everyone how to use iNat, how to host bioblitzes, best practices for teaching other people to use iNat, checking every single project that gets made to make sure it’s made correctly, creating logos in multiple languages, maintaining the website, dealing with APIs to create the leaderboard on the website because not every city uses iNat, writing press releases, answering questions from the organizers and all the other people who hear about the CNC and have questions, developing all the educational materials (thanks to our education working group!), holding monthly meetings, doing evaluation at the end of the CNC, etc. When we hold a meeting we actually hold three meetings on three different days at three different times to accommodate all the time zones of the organizers, and go over the same information three times. We also break down the results in so many other ways besides just top cities for observations, species, and people - it’s hard to get away from those since those are what iNat displays on projects, but we provide the organizers so many ways to look at the results that highlight smaller cities, cities new to iNat/CNC, different climates, etc. And we try to make all CNC-related decisions as democratic as possible, making sure we hear the voices of our organizers. Our organizers choose the “place” that they want for their CNC projects as well.
Having multiple CNCs or a rolling CNC would mean we’re training and working with new organizers throughout the year. I love the idea. It’s just not feasible currently.
I know it’s the internet and I shouldn’t take things personally, but many of these comments pretty much feel like “you two aren’t doing this very well and I have much better ideas for organizing the City Nature Challenge” and it kind of sucks. I consider myself part of the iNaturalist community as well - I may not post in the forum all that often so might not be a recognized voice, but I have 12K observations and have been out there documenting nature using iNat since 2011, just like many of you. I generally feel like the CNC has been pretty successful, especially in helping bring new areas around the world to iNaturalist, and for four days, giving lots of people a reason to connect with their local nature.
I of course welcome thoughts about the CNC, but please realize that the CNC isn’t run by iNaturalist, and as organizers we’re pretty much at capacity for what we can do. I would appreciate any suggestions about the City Nature Challenge that are solution-oriented given our constraints (e.g., if you want multiple CNCs, who can you suggest to organize the other ones?). Thanks.