there’s often confusion and frustration with the way the “can be improved?” DQA item works. fundamentally, i think this functionality is just implemented at the wrong level, and that really needs to be the first thing fixed before anything else is done with “can be improved?”.
pisum
5
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observations not becoming "Research Grade" properly. Issue with Subspecific vs. Specific ID | 5 | 231 | October 4, 2025 | |
| All it takes is 1 person to overturn a genus level research grade ID if you tick "no" on "Based on the evidence, can the Community Taxon still be confirmed or improved?" | 9 | 706 | December 22, 2024 | |
| Subspecies at RG with just one ID | 5 | 1580 | October 28, 2019 | |
| Species level ID not going to RG? | 1 | 121 | October 8, 2025 | |
| Agreeing only with the nominal species is making a subspecific identification research grade | 11 | 1205 | October 2, 2025 |