This thread looks like it is moving toward academic elitism. I’m going to push back a bit in that someone who is familiar with a given species may reach the point of identifying it by gestalt (“it just looks right”), even if the image does not show the specific features that an “expert” would need. We have discussed this before, for example, in threads like If we took an iNaturalist approach to real life.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| People making wrong suggestions | 127 | 7178 | May 2, 2024 | |
| Identification Etiquette on iNaturalist - Wiki | 204 | 36548 | November 3, 2025 | |
| A Kind Reminder To Only Identify What You Are Sure Of! | 32 | 2025 | June 7, 2024 | |
| A Question Or Two For My Fellow IDers | 29 | 1088 | March 6, 2025 | |
| How to understand identifications of other users, subjective and unsaid meanings of different IDs, and the best practices when identifying | 48 | 2231 | July 6, 2024 |