I think this type of info about names is very interesting myself, but I also don’t think it is really a core focus of iNat. The fundamental reason for including common names on iNat is to enable users to provide an identification in their own language/using the terms that they are familiar with. Other info about names may be interesting but seems to me to be tangential to the focus and functionality of iNat. You could always write a journal post on iNat (or blog post elsewhere and link to it in comments) if you want to get the info out there.
1 Like