That’s perfect. So the folks who simultaneously argue in favour of hiding the dates for obscured observations on iNat, and for having their obscured observations reviewed and otherwise treated the same as other observations are shooting themselves in the foot. Anybody who really wants to figure out where they were on a particular day just has to follow the breadcrumbs (unless they are diligent about obscuring all their observations for the date in question).
It would work a bit better if people obscured all their (nearby) observations for the date they made their observation which they are trying to hide. Some people do this, but I suspect that many fail to think it through.