Just needed to vent a little here… I’m finding some identifiers do not bother to read the notes I provide, or to look at additional photos beyond the first one, leading to confusion that would otherwise be quite simple to resolve. If identifying, take a few moments to read! Okay, I feel better now…

[image] neylon: Honestly it’s getting so frustrating dealing with some observers complete lack of understanding regarding mistakes or the amount of time that identifying takes, that I’ve pretty much stopped And there are highly active IDers who are regularly rude, dismissive, and insulting an…

[image] spiphany: Where these tensions turn into conflicts, it often seems to result from at least one of the participants being unable or unwilling to see the situation from the perspective of the other user or to recognize that there are other needs and desires besides their own. True in ev…

[image] nilshelstrom: I’m finding some identifiers do not bother to read the notes I provide, or to look at additional photos beyond the first one I’m curious. How does one go about determining this to be true?

I’ve never heard this unwritten rule? I certainly don’t think it’s necessary to call someone a burden to the system because you have decided their observation-ID proportion is too low for your liking?

I imagine that if you have two quite different species in the first photo but only one in later photos, and include a note to say which you’re interested in, it would be fairly clear that they’re not either reading the notes or looking at later photos if they pick the wrong species to ID?

Totally correct…I have a tendancy to be snarky, and that’s not nice of me.

It’s not a rule, but the logic is similar to the idea that, say, if you live in a household with multiple people it is a bit rude to complain about the cooking or the time that dinner is ready if you don’t regularly help out by doing the cooking or other household duties yourself.

“I’m curious. How does one go about determining this to be true?” You could ask. My answer: I find that sometimes I didn’t read notes that would have helped and sometimes I fail to find the multiple species observations because I didn’t look beyond the first photo. I shouldn’t do these things an…

This right here. I don’t want to add to the pile on - but it is much appreciated when a person’s ID contributions match or exceed their ID requests. I say exceed, because unless your ID is correct in the first place, it takes two (minimum) IDs to get to species level (and often more, if disagreemen…

Identifiers: Read the notes!

General

jnstuart September 25, 2025, 2:45pm 58

It’s not a rule, written or unwritten, more like a recommended practice. I’m not a “power IDer” but I’m also not a “power observer”. I have more IDs than observations so I feel I’m doing okay.

2 Likes

Topic		Replies	Views
ID based on observer notes General question	47	1291	November 23, 2025
Identify identifiers IDs General identify	127	3242	November 12, 2025
Shouting into the Abyss - Why do some "easy" observations sometimes go unidentified? General	81	2060	September 21, 2024
Blog Post Discussion: December 2025 Identifiers Survey General	77	1597	April 5, 2026
What ID'ing feels like at around 1K ID's General	43	1639	April 7, 2026

Identifiers: Read the notes!

Related topics