is a bit broader than adding stuff to the Indigenous name slot and I hope folks see it as having merit. It probably wouldn’t apply in a lot of cases but it would serve as a useful foundation for moving forward.
I do have a concern that partly reflects the point made by @intyrely_eco
The people best positioned to provide indigenous names are indigenous people and the best way to engage their knowledge would be to involve them in iNature directly. It’s not as if this sort of tech is alien to indigenous communities: the Nunavut Wildlife Management Board uses a platform produced by a company called Trailmark . If iNature wants their help, there would might be a cost; folks are tired of people taking their knowledge without compensation.