I think a lot of plant observations end up at Dicot (or Monocot or Fern or Moss or whatever) because they can’t be identified any further, even by competent, experienced identifiers. Sometimes I look at Dicots in my region and once in a long while, I can refine the ID further, but not often. And yet I know my limits as a plant identifier (I have lots!), so I don’t mark such observations As Good As Can Be. After a few years, these observations pile up higher and higher, so people get the impression that no one ever looks at them.
lynnharper
49
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thoughts on unknown ID level? | 59 | 1402 | October 9, 2025 | |
| Does anyone else get bothered by how many observations are marked as "unknown species"? | 231 | 9454 | December 27, 2022 | |
| Why do some serious "power users" add so many unknown observations? | 122 | 13920 | September 12, 2020 | |
| Heavy sigh. Comments regarding the UNKNOWN option of identifying the observation | 140 | 3558 | September 22, 2024 | |
| Amount of "Unknown" records is decreasing | 555 | 38960 | July 8, 2021 |