This is to me the least important reason. I know that in some areas, people are really invested into “county records”, but from the point of view of biology, the made-up lines on the ground really have no importance. For this purpose, I would see much more important if the observation occurred for example across very different habitats or something like that, where relevant information is actually lost, but not just administrative lines.
That having said, the chances of me ever correcting a location like that are essentially zero ever since we started systematically geotagging everything. I often don’t even correct for the situations where the phone is not on me while observing - typically when snorkeling the logged location might be a kilometer away. The convenience of geotagging allows me to process much more observations efficiently so that some inaccuracy is the price worth paying for that.