I’ve been trying to find useful information on these, and most of it seems vague if not downright obscurantist. Why, for example, can I not find something along the lines of “these species taste peppery or acrid, these other species have no taste”? Or “these species are mycorrhizal with oaks, these with beech, these with pines…” and so forth? Everbody is so busy writing about how difficult they are that nobody bothers to group them by any observable characteristic. In post #22, you gave us a breakdown of Amanita sections, even if they cannot go to species; it sure would be nice to have something like this for Russula.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most Common R.G. Fungi/Lichen Obs. by State/Province (U.S.A./Canada) | 39 | 2057 | June 21, 2024 | |
| Resources for Identifying Fungi | 36 | 2587 | February 19, 2023 | |
| Is there any groups on iNat that with only a few or even no expert (or regionally no) to help? | 40 | 2280 | March 5, 2023 | |
| Observing & Identifying Wildlife - wiki | 17 | 3879 | May 5, 2026 | |
| Are there any taxa that need more identifiers and aren’t cryptic/near-impossible to identify? Or are those things mutually exclusive? | 61 | 1308 | August 16, 2026 |