Any progress on this? I think it should be a live update like the other annotations as a lot of projects still use this (and similar) fields.
I was out taking photos of winter seedheads today, and I agree that there’s too much ambiguity in declaring aboveground vegetation “dead.” Senescent stems and leaves with live seeds look “dead,” but it’s a normal dormant stage, like a butterfly pupa. I’m not seeing what purpose it would serve to lump these in with actually dead plants.
Anual plants die each year, it is the definition for anual plants! The seeds are another different individual, and the parent plant is dead.
The pupa metaphore I think that is incorrect and missleading, a pupa is a stage of a living individual that is also metabolically very very active, and is an instair to get to adult form. If you want to make a metaphore for anual plants maybe the best one is a dead mother spider (or other animal) with their eggs close to it; so you could focus your observation on the mother or the eggs, that are two clearly different individuals.
If the observation is made for the paternal dead plant then the answer is that the plant is dead. Marking dead anual plants could be very helpful for climatic and ecological research; answering questions like when the anual plants start to die each year, and how this compare to past years. Also some anual plants individuals might die without a chance to make seeds before dying.
If you make an observation showing seeds that seam to be alive, then you might say that the plant is alive, but then could be useful to add a “seed” or “seed stage” annotation or something like that.
I get that this could be confusing for some geophytes, because they look like there are dead in some seasons, but the individuals are still alive underground, and also there are some other questions like when an anual plant might be consider dead, so not sure if the value that we might get from the alive-dead annotation would be worth the complex determination.
We botanists are well aware of the difference between dead annuals, dead perennials, and dormant perennials (though distinguishing the latter two can sometimes be difficult). However, this is a citizen science project. There’s no point in using categories that will be misclassified a high percentage of the time.
That is what I was trying to say with this:
Maybe I explained myself a little badly, sorry for that.
There are also a few projects where I think all observations could safely be marked dead. The first three that come to mind have over 10K observations together.
Edit: I forgot the roadkill projects, that’s easily another 15K+, e.g.
Seeing the last comment I just realized something. I think that all observations that have sounds on it should be marked as alive, I am right? Could you think any example of an observation with a sound for a “Dead” or “Cannot Be Determined” option?
A rabbit or bullfrog screaming while being predated. Although the animal is technically still alive at that point. (Unpleasant and probably not something I’d personally care to post on iNat.)
I do not think that there are much of this example on iNat, I was thinking more like a major source of observations with sound on it. Also as you have said the animal is technically still alive, so depending on the situation it may survive, so it should really be consider dead?
What organism sounds are posted to iNat that are identifiable to species? Songs or other vocalizations of birds, frogs, some insects (e.g., cicadas). Some mammals (e.g., coyote and wolf; cetaceans; primates). Some marine fish vocalize. But all very much alive.
All this projects seam to be about dead animals:
That’s the first time I’ve ever seen a Keyboard Shortcuts screen. Since I now had an existence proof, I brought up Identify/Annotations in my browser and looked at the screen for the ten-thousandth time…hmm, no Keyboard Shortcuts here…wait, what’s this tiny icon in the lower lefthand corner of the modal dialog? Eureka!
Perhaps I’m just dense but it never occurred to me that I should look in the lower lefthand corner for documentation on a process that’s happening on the right half of the dialog. Shouldn’t there be a question mark icon adjacent to the annotation drop-down menus?
Just my two cents.
I would not auto add any dead indication to any bird window strike projects. These projects can and do contain observations of birds found which survived their strike.
Other projects should work well, Dead Birds is for dead, same does Dead Mammals.
You are totally right, I probably read Car Collision, not sure why. My bad, I have deleted it
Could “Cannot be determined” be added as an option for all the annotations? It would be useful for clearing out a lot of observations with indeterminate Life Stages, which cannot currently be annotated without this option.
It would be useful for many animals without clear sexual dimorphism.
Yes, should happen soon. We’re not going to be able to include all of them, but I’ve made a list of some of the more oft-used ones for a start.
I can bring that up with our team.
Yeah, I think that’s something in the offing.
OK, the following Observation Fields should map to the
Alive or Dead annotation:
Certain values won’t affect the annotation, like
Dead or alive and
Roadkill. The site is also auto annotating observations that currently have these fields, it might take a little while to go through all of them.
I’m sure we missed a few, so if there are any well-used fields that could work here, please let me know, especially ones that are not in English.
Any possibility to auto-annotate observations in specific traditional projects, like https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/dead-herps?