Thank you for the link. There are several quite good ideas in that thread. Anyway, I do hope inat observations will not make much harm to threatened species. Poachers for smaller things (fishes, plants) will hardly use it, poachers for larger things probably have better devices, general public will mostly not recognize the species even if it hit their face. The rest - irresponsible photographers/observers are few and will hardly make significant impact. Land developers and similar - they will hardly use inaturalist, too.
jurga_li
22
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danger of locations on iNaturalist | 21 | 5752 | November 25, 2019 | |
| Downsides to iNat observation locations (with emphasis towards herps) | 48 | 3289 | April 27, 2022 | |
| Obscuring on map vs lists | 55 | 5114 | October 3, 2019 | |
| Pros and Cons of obscuring geoprivacy | 32 | 695 | August 12, 2026 | |
| Concern about disapearing species | 23 | 1190 | July 21, 2023 |