The problem, I suppose, is that it’s possible to disagree with different levels in different ways. Say there is an observation of a common species. If I come across that as someone who knows the common species, but is unfamiliar with the alternatives - I may know that it is not the common species but still be completely clueless about what it is. I may bump it back to family. What I mean by that might not be that I disagree with the genus, but that I disagree with the species, and the most I am sure of is the family. I can’t identify at genus just because I don’t know enough to disagree with it - my ID has to be positive based on my knowledge. To me it almost feels like a bug that I am assumed to be actively disagreeing with the intervening levels - and I agree that most people also don’t understand that this is happening.
matthewvosper
193
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Are there too many new observations to identify? | 104 | 6153 | January 10, 2021 | |
| Do you make more observations on iNat or identifications | 116 | 1782 | December 3, 2024 | |
| Identify identifiers IDs | 126 | 3640 | September 13, 2025 | |
| Identifications taking longer? | 155 | 4207 | October 13, 2025 | |
| Poll: Are You Primarily an iNat Observer or Identifier? | 101 | 4227 | February 13, 2020 |