Is the iNatForum-General the appropriate place to note suggestions? Case example: Alpine Jelly Cone (Guepiniopsis alpina) is what the algorithm suggests when uploading yellow conical blob-like fungi. And later the displays under the Compare menu are all adjacent species. In reality, this is a wid…

The OP has been tagged “Solved” by someone or a machine. As the initiator of the post, do I have to accept this resolution? (Bear with me as I am still new to iNat and learning) Honestly, I do not consider it solved, and as a former programmer and life-long end user of various neural networks, I kn…

[image] SixthSeason: tagged “Solved” by someone or a machine. As the initiator of the post, do I have to accept this resolution? No, you don’t. Try unchecking it yourself (in the post where it was marked, not in the OP where it is displayed). If that doesn’t work let me know and I’ll do it.

I had tried that, no luck. Just tried again, still no luck. Tried clicking on the green check mark on upper left Tried the arrow on the upper right Tried the three dots on the lower right Didn’t see a way to “unsolve”.

Based on your description, you were trying to uncheck it where it is displayed at the bottom of the first post. Instead, you have to go to the actual post that was selected as the solution (in this case, the second post), and uncheck it at bottom-center of that post.

I think the inclusion criteria for species could be reformed in some way. Right now, leaf taxa are included if they have 100 or more observations (or roughly something along those lines). The rationale for this is that they don’t want to include taxa where there are few images and thus little traini…

[image] Should There Be More Reward Mechanisms for Identifiers? Telling people to be more cautious, than the process that produces the suggestions, does not work. It is like telling people not to think about the elephant. I don’t know. I think there really is a general misunderstanding about …

Definitely allow hybrids to be considered again. Excluding hybrids is really just a recipe for hybrids being misidentified as one of their parents. In some cases, one of the hybrid’s parents is rare. This is likely to lead to hybrids being identified as the common parent. I would like for hybrids …

At some point I will join this conversation. But I likely have way to much to say about how one can improve the CV. I started a bit ago and plan more journal posts about this. They are not at all finished. But there if anybody wants to take a look. https://www.inaturalist.org/journal/zoology123/10…

So good to see such good ideas being presented and wealth of wisdom being shared. Does anyone know what kind of requirements management software and/or issue tracking system iNat is using? In my non-biology world we like DOORS and Jira, but I am guessing GitHub-like apps would be the choice here?

Recommendations on improving the AI algorithm?

General

SixthSeason March 23, 2025, 12:38am 32

Thank you, got it. Done.

Topic		Replies	Views
Problems with Computer Vision and new/inexperienced users General	134	5541	December 27, 2021
Can CV be changed upon request? General question , computer-vision	26	730	March 28, 2026
New Computer Vision Model Released News and Updates	73	3750	May 20, 2024
Don't use computer vision General	169	9765	September 18, 2020
CV suggestions no longer accurate after City Nature Challenge General	42	946	July 18, 2025

Recommendations on improving the AI algorithm?

Related topics