I was proposing a blanket restraint by added verification steps that would mark models of some taxa as unreliable. That would be awesome.
The taxa I mentioned are hard or impossible to identify from photos, highly variable across their range and look similar to some other taxa in the same genus or even in the same family.
Community controlled restraint means someone has to go through hundreds of observations and correct them. It is a toss up between thankless drudgery and impossible. I focus on the ones where I can provide an alternative and correct, genus level observations where a taxon level ID can be reached, usually after days of correspondence with the observer and expert identifiers.
People are expected to provide identifications, not guesses. CV should do the same. using models that are verified not to mass mis-identify.
Edit: the original quote is from my post on the thread about how to reward identifiers, where I did not see the need to provide any technical details.