It’s possible I didn’t understand what you were getting at?
If you’re happy with the way crosses are modeled via nomenclature, then it’s just a data-mapping exercise to try to normalize data across analogs. I don’t know. I was all set to let it drop and then I guess I thought you were asking something you weren’t asking.
If there are a bunch of things like Taraxacum in the dataset, I do believe it would be good to experiment with a more consistent architecture that could be mapped to from all analogs. And something that could be agreed to about the treatment of the species rank in particular. But I can see it would be an extremely difficult conversation to have. If you’d like me to send you my thoughts privately, I’d be happy to.