Thank you, I hadn’t seen that page before. A different iNat help page says: “the observation doesn’t present evidence related to one subject (e.g. it has four photos of unrelated organisms. A photo showing habitat of the observation’s subject is OK.)” Which I read as: Multiple photos of multiple organisms is given as an example, but not as the definition. (If staff read this, they might want to clarify the text on the help page I just cited.) I’ll now change my practice – and fortunately I’ve very rarely used that DQA (maybe twice?) so not too much harm has been done.
danlharp
7
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New DQA: Does "Evidence related to a single subject" mean the same individual is in all photos? | 101 | 3226 | May 26, 2024 | |
| Add a DQA choice for "survey" photos | 26 | 3310 | March 18, 2019 | |
| "Evidence relates to one subject" DQA and photos with multiple species in them | 22 | 540 | May 26, 2024 | |
| Easy way to mark multiple-species observations | 218 | 13278 | April 19, 2025 | |
| Overzealous observations | 42 | 4447 | September 23, 2019 |