Gave it a try. Thanks everybody for the great help :)
1 Like
I think iNat is expecting âsnapshotsâ - literally - and isnât set up nor interested in processes. The solution I use is to place links to previous obs of the same thing, like
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/309857829
But I think a single obs with a series of pics with dates, or times, and explanatory notes would be better.
But that describes, literally, a series of multiple observations, not a single observation. Otherwise, where does a âsingleâ observation even begin or end?
4 Likes
Have you tried this?
2 Likes
Yes, a research scientist would so define it. If I take a series of pH measurements at one water sampling site at different times, or a series of DBH measurements of one tree at different times, or a series of percent cover measurements of one transect at different times, each measurement is considered a separate observation.
Plant annotations are pretty terrible on iNat. The annotations donât apply to whole swathes of plants, so cannot be added accurately anyway.
Itâs vastly more useful to have a single observation of a single specimen that records all the details about it.
Yes thatâs what I said.
âI think iNat is expecting âsnapshotsâ - literally - and isnât set up nor interested in processes.â
I know it would cause huge layers of complexity to change iNat, but as an ecologist, not a taxonomist, processes and interactions are where itâs at. IDing individuals is just a necessary starting point, like learning to read.
1 Like
but each single measurement is only a single data point, without context. Only when placed in a table, or otherwise correlated, do they become information.
Yeah, gotta be on my to-do list, somewhere in the top half.
Thatâs the quest of the researcher, not the concern of the observer. The observer records the data from the individual interaction.
3 Likes