This is a startling accomplishment given how many of a species need to be identified for each to be recognized within the CV. (In case no Observer has said so, thank you.)
Do any identifications stand out? Maybe you could detail one or more in this thread.
My inclination is to leave taxa photos to the Identification experts within that taxa. (If they choose poorly, they may see more uploads at species they may not have intended.)
PD: I had no idea there was taxon photos vandalism afoot. Thank you to everyone, including the volunteers, Curators and non-Curators, who are helping clean it up.