Agreed, but what one “should” is different from what one “does”. Not to throw anyone under the bus, but people I have worked under in the federal government when asked about this have said, go ahead and post anything you find to iNat, but obscure the sensitive species. The nuance of image copyright is not widely understood or considered by various levels of natural resource managers, even those who are particularly adept in species data. This is my point. I think we could do better as a community of getting the word out.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Does copyright law allow you to restrict use of your observations—the data, this is, not the photos? | 32 | 3216 | July 11, 2023 | |
| Copyrighted records: is it possible to cite them in academic papers? How? | 22 | 1066 | October 25, 2024 | |
| All rights reserved observations | 28 | 3244 | February 21, 2021 | |
| Improve viewing & editing copyright information on observations | 32 | 3540 | June 4, 2025 | |
| Licensing problem for paper using iNat data | 60 | 3120 | January 17, 2023 |