“All rights reserved” is kind of a weird case, and I don’t really know why inat offers that as an option - it’s one of those boilerplate things that people parrot on copyright notices because they’ve seen it said somewhere else - but what it actually means is that you give nobody any licence to use or redistribute the work for any purpose whatsoever.
If it wasn’t for the inat ToS overriding that in the case of things uploaded to inat, even inat would have no permission to use things you licenced that way. It’s not clear if even fair use is permitted in the case where strict proprietary rights have been entirely reserved, and attribution is moot because you aren’t allowed to redistribute it at all - so it probably doesn’t really belong (or get any ticks) on that table at all.
Not just a similar licence, it must be a compatible one, that grants all users the same rights, and adds no additional restrictions to what the original licence gave to you. The SA and copyleft licences are the only ones which guarantee that all the rights which you originally granted to everyone will persist in perpetuity.