I think these kinds of IDs need to be made on a taxon-by-taxon basis. You highlight a good example of a class of cases where it’s more justified, but for many other taxa it may be more typically much less necessary or useful. So I wouldn’t just say that ID by range is just generally good practice on iNat.
barbetsmith
12
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What should represent a 'range' for a species in iNaturalist | 65 | 8774 | September 24, 2021 | |
| On observations with unusually low location accuracy | 90 | 1595 | June 8, 2025 | |
| Huge "Accuracy" Circles | 44 | 1014 | March 25, 2026 | |
| Location and date accuracy of iNaturalist observations | 46 | 1999 | June 5, 2024 | |
| Etiquette for ID of species with no visual differences | 159 | 8527 | March 23, 2020 |