I agree that not every taxon is an issue with using range. Since I posted this, I tried to notice when I was assuming ID by range and it remains an easy short-cut or necessity. I think my primary concern is when the error bubble is so large as to encompass multiple taxa and when the way location is added compounds that by mis-placing the pin. In some very few cases, this likely generates error in the ID process. Otherwise, location is essential for IDs in many many instance.
petezani
16
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identifying based on location | 47 | 955 | June 3, 2026 | |
| What should represent a 'range' for a species in iNaturalist | 63 | 8871 | July 31, 2019 | |
| On observations with unusually low location accuracy | 89 | 1892 | June 8, 2025 | |
| Huge "Accuracy" Circles | 43 | 1072 | January 24, 2026 | |
| Location and date accuracy of iNaturalist observations | 45 | 2095 | April 6, 2024 |