I’ve heard the same too, that’s why I thought an “Invasive species” is just a really really bad “weed” for scientists
.
so… does this mean “Invasive species” existed before humans were even around?
who decides where it belongs or doesn’t belong? by natural you mean it got there by non-human ways?
But aren’t many “Invasive species” also Pioneer species?
Can a “Native” species be invasive too?
So in other words they have naturalized? Won’t every “Invasive species” eventually become “Native”? How did “Native” species evolve in the first place? and why can’t we evolve new species as well?
Not sarcastic, I just never learned a concrete definition of "Native’ that didn’t have loopholes that break the whole definition making the term useless.
So any species that formed Symbiosis with Homo sapiens is not “Native” no more?
What about new species that have been created thru domestication like Cucumis melo, Cucurbita pepo, Zea mays, Solanum lycopersicum, Solanum tuberosum and the new Genus Brassicoraphanus which is an intergeneric hybrid between Brassica x Raphnaus.
Where is Brassicoraphanus “Native” to? Where it was first created right?
Perhaps but they allow many other species to grow thanks to holding the soil & improving with nitrogen fixation. Essentially fixing broken soils to support more life.
Agreed, many of these plants provide more food overall for both human & Animal. I get sadden when the birds eat all the wineberries, clearing my local enviroment is tell me it needs more berries, like Wineberries, Black raspberries ect.
I also learned why Blackberries became thorny, it’s because of deer. Deer also don’t eat Garlic mustard, Shiso, Garlic, Spicebush, all of which are “Invasive” to Maryland (They all grow like weeds, most abundant plants in my local forrests).