Bounding box does not exclude observations that should be excluded

Bug Reports
1

Please fill out the following sections to the best of your ability, it will help us investigate bugs if we have this information at the outset. Screenshots are especially helpful, so please provide those if you can.

Platform: Website

Browser, if a website issue: Chrome

Not entirely certain what’s going wrong here, but I was looking at my own observations and playing around with the bounding box when this happened: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?nelat=-8&nelng=-190&place_id=any&subview=map&swlat=-46&swlng=109&user_id=matthew_connors&verifiable=any

image
image1901×909 146 KB

I can think of no good reason why those easternmost observations from Fiji are inexplicably included in the search despite being well outside the box. The numbers of sightings and species are as they would be expected if there was no box, so it’s not just a loading issue either. It works when I am logged out as well. Happy to provide more info if needed but hopefully this is enough to work out what’s going wrong!

2

I suspect that it has to do with your longitude range including a large west (negative) value (-190) – while the bounding box is drawn correctly, the search seems to mess up. When I substitute the equivalent lon = 170 for -190, those observations disappear:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?nelat=-8&nelng=170&place_id=any&subview=map&swlat=-46&swlng=109&user_id=matthew_connors&verifiable=any

Definitely a bug in lat/lon searches, but I’d guess it can be avoided by keeping longitudes in the range of -180 to +180.

2 Likes
3

Ahh I see, yes that would make sense